5.6.6.3 Using Version Tokens

Before using Version Tokens, install it according to the instructions provided at Section 5.6.6.2, “Installing or Uninstalling Version Tokens”.

A scenario in which Version Tokens can be useful is a system that accesses a collection of MySQL servers but needs to manage them for load balancing purposes by monitoring them and adjusting server assignments according to load changes. Such a system comprises these components:

Version Tokens permit server access to be managed according to assignment without requiring clients to repeatedly query the servers about their assignments:

The client-side logic for detecting version token errors and selecting a new server can be implemented different ways:

The following example illustrates the preceding discussion in more concrete form.

When Version Tokens initializes on a given server, the server's version token list is empty. Token list maintenance is performed by calling user-defined functions (UDFs). The VERSION_TOKEN_ADMIN or SUPER privilege is required to call any of the Version Token UDFs, so token list modification is expected to be done by a management or administrative application that has that privilege.

Suppose that a management application communicates with a set of servers that are queried by clients to access employee and product databases (named emp and prod, respectively). All servers are permitted to process data retrieval statements, but only some of them are permitted to make database updates. To handle this on a database-specific basis, the management application establishes a list of version tokens on each server. In the token list for a given server, token names represent database names and token values are read or write depending on whether the database must be used in read-only fashion or whether it can take reads and writes.

Client applications register a list of version tokens they require the server to match by setting a system variable. Variable setting occurs on a client-specific basis, so different clients can register different requirements. By default, the client token list is empty, which matches any server token list. When a client sets its token list to a nonempty value, matching may succeed or fail, depending on the server version token list.

To define the version token list for a server, the management application calls the version_tokens_set() UDF. (There are also UDFs for modifying and displaying the token list, described later.) For example, the application might send these statements to a group of three servers:

Server 1:

Server 2:

Server 3:

The token list in each case is specified as a semicolon-separated list of name=value pairs. The resulting token list values result in these server assingments:

In addition to assigning each server a version token list, the management application also maintains a cache that reflects the server assignments.

Before communicating with the servers, a client application contacts the management application and retrieves information about server assignments. Then the client selects a server based on those assignments. Suppose that a client wants to perform both reads and writes on the emp database. Based on the preceding assignments, only server 2 qualifies. The client connects to server 2 and registers its server requirements there by setting its version_tokens_session system variable:

For subsequent statements sent by the client to server 2, the server compares its own version token list to the client list to check whether they match. If so, statements execute normally:

Discrepancies between the server and client version token lists can occur two ways:

As long as the assignment of server 2 does not change, the client continues to use it for reads and writes. But suppose that the management application wants to change server assignments so that writes for the emp database must be sent to server 1 instead of server 2. To do this, it uses version_tokens_edit() to modify the emp token value on the two servers (and updates its cache of server assignments):

Server 1:

Server 2:

version_tokens_edit() modifies the named tokens in the server token list and leaves other tokens unchanged.

The next time the client sends a statement to server 2, its own token list no longer matches the server token list and an error occurs:

In this case, the client should contact the management application to obtain updated information about server assignments, select a new server, and send the failed statement to the new server.

For each statement received from a client, the server implicitly uses locking, as follows:

The server uses shared locks so that comparisons for multiple sessions can occur without blocking, while preventing changes to the tokens for any session that attempts to acquire an exclusive lock before it manipulates tokens of the same names in the server token list.

The preceding example uses only a few of the user-defined included in the Version Tokens plugin library, but there are others. One set of UDFs permits the server's list of version tokens to be manipulated and inspected. Another set of UDFs permits version tokens to be locked and unlocked.

These UDFs permit the server's list of version tokens to be created, changed, removed, and inspected:

Each of those functions, if successful, returns a binary string indicating what action occurred. The following example establishes the server token list, modifies it by adding a new token, deletes some tokens, and displays the resulting token list:

Warnings occur if a token list is malformed:

As mentioned previously, version tokens are defined using a semicolon-separated list of name=value pairs. Consider this invocation of version_tokens_set():

Version Tokens interprets the argument as follows:

Given those rules, the preceding version_tokens_set() call results in a token list with two tokens: tok1 has the value 1'2 3"4, and tok2 has the value a = b. To verify this, call version_tokens_show():

If the token list contains two tokens, why did version_tokens_set() return the value 3 version tokens set? That occurred because the original token list contained two definitions for tok1, and the second definition replaced the first.

The Version Tokens token-manipulation UDFs place these constraints on token names and values:

Version Tokens also includes a set of UDFs enabling tokens to be locked and unlocked:

Each locking function returns nonzero for success. Otherwise, an error occurs:

Locking using Version Tokens locking functions is advisory; applications must agree to cooperate.

It is possible to lock nonexisting token names. This does not create the tokens.

For the Version Tokens locking functions, token name arguments are used exactly as specified. Surrounding whitespace is not ignored and = and ; characters are permitted. This is because Version Tokens simply passes the token names to be locked as is to the locking service.