Rechercher dans le manuel MySQL
22.1.6 MySQL Server Using InnoDB Compared with NDB Cluster
[+/-]
MySQL Server offers a number of choices in storage engines. Since
both NDB and
InnoDB can serve as transactional
MySQL storage engines, users of MySQL Server sometimes become
interested in NDB Cluster. They see
NDB as a possible alternative or
upgrade to the default InnoDB storage
engine in MySQL 8.0. While NDB and
InnoDB share common characteristics,
there are differences in architecture and implementation, so that
some existing MySQL Server applications and usage scenarios can be
a good fit for NDB Cluster, but not all of them.
In this section, we discuss and compare some characteristics of
the NDB storage engine used by NDB
8.0 with InnoDB used in MySQL 8.0.
The next few sections provide a technical comparison. In many
instances, decisions about when and where to use NDB Cluster must
be made on a case-by-case basis, taking all factors into
consideration. While it is beyond the scope of this documentation
to provide specifics for every conceivable usage scenario, we also
attempt to offer some very general guidance on the relative
suitability of some common types of applications for
NDB as opposed to
InnoDB back ends.
NDB Cluster 8.0 uses a mysqld based on MySQL
8.0, including support for InnoDB
1.1. While it is possible to use InnoDB tables
with NDB Cluster, such tables are not clustered. It is also not
possible to use programs or libraries from an NDB Cluster 8.0
distribution with MySQL Server 8.0, or the reverse.
While it is also true that some types of common business
applications can be run either on NDB Cluster or on MySQL Server
(most likely using the InnoDB storage
engine), there are some important architectural and implementation
differences. Section 22.1.6.1, “Differences Between the NDB and InnoDB Storage Engines”,
provides a summary of the these differences. Due to the
differences, some usage scenarios are clearly more suitable for
one engine or the other; see
Section 22.1.6.2, “NDB and InnoDB Workloads”. This in turn
has an impact on the types of applications that better suited for
use with NDB or
InnoDB. See
Section 22.1.6.3, “NDB and InnoDB Feature Usage Summary”, for a comparison
of the relative suitability of each for use in common types of
database applications.
For information about the relative characteristics of the
NDB and
MEMORY storage engines, see
When to Use MEMORY or NDB Cluster.
See Chapter 16, Alternative Storage Engines, for additional information about MySQL storage engines.
Traduction non disponible
Le manuel MySQL n'est pas encore traduit en français sur l'infobrol. Seule la version anglaise est disponible pour l'instant.
Document créé le 26/06/2006, dernière modification le 26/10/2018
Source du document imprimé : https://www.gaudry.be/mysql-rf-mysql-cluster-compared.html
L'infobrol est un site personnel dont le contenu n'engage que moi. Le texte est mis à disposition sous licence CreativeCommons(BY-NC-SA). Plus d'info sur les conditions d'utilisation et sur l'auteur.
Références
Ces références et liens indiquent des documents consultés lors de la rédaction de cette page, ou qui peuvent apporter un complément d'information, mais les auteurs de ces sources ne peuvent être tenus responsables du contenu de cette page.
L'auteur de ce site est seul responsable de la manière dont sont présentés ici les différents concepts, et des libertés qui sont prises avec les ouvrages de référence. N'oubliez pas que vous devez croiser les informations de sources multiples afin de diminuer les risques d'erreurs.
