Rechercher dans le manuel MySQL

15.8.8 Configuring Spin Lock Polling

InnoDB mutexes and rw-locks are typically reserved for short intervals. On a multi-core system, it can be more efficient for a thread to continuously check if it can acquire a mutex or rw-lock for a period of time before it sleeps. If the mutex or rw-lock becomes available during this period, the thread can continue immediately, in the same time slice. However, too-frequent polling of a shared object such as a mutex or rw-lock by multiple threads can cause cache ping pong, which results in processors invalidating portions of each other's cache. InnoDB minimizes this issue by forcing a random delay between polls to desychronize polling activity. The random delay is implemented as a spin-wait loop.

The duration of a spin-wait loop is determined by the number of PAUSE instructions that occur in the loop. That number is generated by randomly selecting an integer ranging from 0 up to but not including the innodb_spin_wait_delay value, and multiplying that value by 50. (The multiplier value, 50, is hardcoded before MySQL 8.0.16, and configurable thereafter.) For example, an integer is randomly selected from the following range for an innodb_spin_wait_delay setting of 6:

{0,1,2,3,4,5}

The selected integer is multiplied by 50, resulting in one of six possible PAUSE instruction values:

{0,50,100,150,200,250}

For that set of values, 250 is the maximum number of PAUSE instructions that can occur in a spin-wait loop. An innodb_spin_wait_delay setting of 5 results in a set of five possible values {0,50,100,150,200}, where 200 is the maximum number of PAUSE instructions, and so on. In this way, the innodb_spin_wait_delay setting controls the maximum delay between spin lock polls.

On a system where all processor cores share a fast cache memory, you might reduce the maximum delay or disable the busy loop altogether by setting innodb_spin_wait_delay=0. On a system with multiple processor chips, the effect of cache invalidation can be more significant and you might increase the maximum delay.

In the 100MHz Pentium era, an innodb_spin_wait_delay unit was calibrated to be equivalent to one microsecond. That time equivalence did not hold, but PAUSE instruction duration remained fairly constant in terms of processor cycles relative to other CPU instructions until the introduction of the Skylake generation of processors, which have a comparatively longer PAUSE instruction. The innodb_spin_wait_pause_multiplier variable was introduced in MySQL 8.0.16 to provide a way to account for differences in PAUSE instruction duration.

The innodb_spin_wait_pause_multiplier variable controls the size of PAUSE instruction values. For example, assuming an innodb_spin_wait_delay setting of 6, decreasing the innodb_spin_wait_pause_multiplier value from 50 (the default and previously hardcoded value) to 5 generates a set of smaller PAUSE instruction values:

{0,5,10,15,20,25}

The ability to increase or decrease PAUSE instruction values permits fine tuning InnoDB for different processor architectures. Smaller PAUSE instruction values would be appropriate for processor architectures with a comparatively longer PAUSE instruction, for example.

The innodb_spin_wait_delay and innodb_spin_wait_pause_multiplier variables are dynamic. They can be specified in a MySQL option file or modified at runtime using a SET GLOBAL statement. Modifying the variables at runtime requires privileges sufficient to set global system variables. See Section 5.1.9.1, “System Variable Privileges”.


Find a PHP function

Document created the 26/06/2006, last modified the 26/10/2018
Source of the printed document:https://www.gaudry.be/en/mysql-rf-innodb-performance-spin_lock_polling.html

The infobrol is a personal site whose content is my sole responsibility. The text is available under CreativeCommons license (BY-NC-SA). More info on the terms of use and the author.

References

  1. View the html document Language of the document:en Manuel MySQL : https://dev.mysql.com/

These references and links indicate documents consulted during the writing of this page, or which may provide additional information, but the authors of these sources can not be held responsible for the content of this page.
The author This site is solely responsible for the way in which the various concepts, and the freedoms that are taken with the reference works, are presented here. Remember that you must cross multiple source information to reduce the risk of errors.

Contents Haut