Rechercher dans le manuel MySQL
15.3 InnoDB Multi-Versioning
InnoDB
is a
multi-versioned storage engine: it
keeps information about old versions of changed rows, to support
transactional features such as concurrency and
rollback. This information is
stored in the tablespace in a data structure called a
rollback segment (after
an analogous data structure in Oracle). InnoDB
uses the information in the rollback segment to perform the undo
operations needed in a transaction rollback. It also uses the
information to build earlier versions of a row for a
consistent read.
Internally, InnoDB
adds three fields to each row
stored in the database. A 6-byte DB_TRX_ID
field
indicates the transaction identifier for the last transaction that
inserted or updated the row. Also, a deletion is treated internally
as an update where a special bit in the row is set to mark it as
deleted. Each row also contains a 7-byte
DB_ROLL_PTR
field called the roll pointer. The
roll pointer points to an undo log record written to the rollback
segment. If the row was updated, the undo log record contains the
information necessary to rebuild the content of the row before it
was updated. A 6-byte DB_ROW_ID
field contains a
row ID that increases monotonically as new rows are inserted. If
InnoDB
generates a clustered index automatically,
the index contains row ID values. Otherwise, the
DB_ROW_ID
column does not appear in any index.
Undo logs in the rollback segment are divided into insert and update
undo logs. Insert undo logs are needed only in transaction rollback
and can be discarded as soon as the transaction commits. Update undo
logs are used also in consistent reads, but they can be discarded
only after there is no transaction present for which
InnoDB
has assigned a snapshot that in a
consistent read could need the information in the update undo log to
build an earlier version of a database row.
Commit your transactions regularly, including those transactions
that issue only consistent reads. Otherwise,
InnoDB
cannot discard data from the update undo
logs, and the rollback segment may grow too big, filling up your
tablespace.
The physical size of an undo log record in the rollback segment is typically smaller than the corresponding inserted or updated row. You can use this information to calculate the space needed for your rollback segment.
In the InnoDB
multi-versioning scheme, a row is
not physically removed from the database immediately when you delete
it with an SQL statement. InnoDB
only physically
removes the corresponding row and its index records when it discards
the update undo log record written for the deletion. This removal
operation is called a purge, and
it is quite fast, usually taking the same order of time as the SQL
statement that did the deletion.
If you insert and delete rows in smallish batches at about the same
rate in the table, the purge thread can start to lag behind and the
table can grow bigger and bigger because of all the
“dead” rows, making everything disk-bound and very
slow. In such a case, throttle new row operations, and allocate more
resources to the purge thread by tuning the
innodb_max_purge_lag
system
variable. See Section 15.13, “InnoDB Startup Options and System Variables” for more
information.
Multi-Versioning and Secondary Indexes
InnoDB
multiversion concurrency control (MVCC)
treats secondary indexes differently than clustered indexes.
Records in a clustered index are updated in-place, and their
hidden system columns point undo log entries from which earlier
versions of records can be reconstructed. Unlike clustered index
records, secondary index records do not contain hidden system
columns nor are they updated in-place.
When a secondary index column is updated, old secondary index
records are delete-marked, new records are inserted, and
delete-marked records are eventually purged. When a secondary
index record is delete-marked or the secondary index page is
updated by a newer transaction, InnoDB
looks up
the database record in the clustered index. In the clustered
index, the record's DB_TRX_ID
is checked, and
the correct version of the record is retrieved from the undo log
if the record was modified after the reading transaction was
initiated.
If a secondary index record is marked for deletion or the
secondary index page is updated by a newer transaction, the
covering index
technique is not used. Instead of returning values from the index
structure, InnoDB
looks up the record in the
clustered index.
However, if the
index
condition pushdown (ICP) optimization is enabled, and parts
of the WHERE
condition can be evaluated using
only fields from the index, the MySQL server still pushes this
part of the WHERE
condition down to the storage
engine where it is evaluated using the index. If no matching
records are found, the clustered index lookup is avoided. If
matching records are found, even among delete-marked records,
InnoDB
looks up the record in the clustered
index.
Document created the 26/06/2006, last modified the 26/10/2018
Source of the printed document:https://www.gaudry.be/en/mysql-rf-innodb-multi-versioning.html
The infobrol is a personal site whose content is my sole responsibility. The text is available under CreativeCommons license (BY-NC-SA). More info on the terms of use and the author.
References
These references and links indicate documents consulted during the writing of this page, or which may provide additional information, but the authors of these sources can not be held responsible for the content of this page.
The author This site is solely responsible for the way in which the various concepts, and the freedoms that are taken with the reference works, are presented here. Remember that you must cross multiple source information to reduce the risk of errors.