Rechercher dans le manuel MySQL

6.2.6 Access Control, Stage 1: Connection Verification

When you attempt to connect to a MySQL server, the server accepts or rejects the connection based on these conditions:

  • Your identity and whether you can verify your identity by supplying the correct password

  • Whether your account is locked or unlocked

The server checks credentials first, then account locking state. A failure for either step causes the server to deny access to you completely. Otherwise, the server accepts the connection, and then enters Stage 2 and waits for requests.

Credential checking is performed using the three user table scope columns (Host, User, and authentication_string). Locking state is recorded in the user table account_locked column. The server accepts the connection only if the Host and User columns in some user table row match the client host name and user name, the client supplies the password specified in that row, and the account_locked value is 'N'. The rules for permissible Host and User values are given in Section 6.2.4, “Specifying Account Names”. Account locking can be changed with the ALTER USER statement.

Your identity is based on two pieces of information:

  • The client host from which you connect

  • Your MySQL user name

If the User column value is nonblank, the user name in an incoming connection must match exactly. If the User value is blank, it matches any user name. If the user table row that matches an incoming connection has a blank user name, the user is considered to be an anonymous user with no name, not a user with the name that the client actually specified. This means that a blank user name is used for all further access checking for the duration of the connection (that is, during Stage 2).

The authentication_string column can be blank. This is not a wildcard and does not mean that any password matches. It means that the user must connect without specifying a password. If the server authenticates a client using a plugin, the authentication method that the plugin implements may or may not use the password in the authentication_string column. In this case, it is possible that an external password is also used to authenticate to the MySQL server.

Nonblank authentication_string values in the user table represent encrypted passwords. MySQL does not store passwords as cleartext for anyone to see. Rather, the password supplied by a user who is attempting to connect is encrypted (using the password hashing method implemented by the account authentication plugin). The encrypted password then is used during the connection process when checking whether the password is correct. This is done without the encrypted password ever traveling over the connection. See Section 6.2.1, “Account User Names and Passwords”.

From MySQL's point of view, the encrypted password is the real password, so you should never give anyone access to it. In particular, do not give nonadministrative users read access to tables in the mysql system database.

The following table shows how various combinations of User and Host values in the user table apply to incoming connections.

User Value Host Value Permissible Connections
'fred' 'h1.example.net' fred, connecting from h1.example.net
'' 'h1.example.net' Any user, connecting from h1.example.net
'fred' '%' fred, connecting from any host
'' '%' Any user, connecting from any host
'fred' '%.example.net' fred, connecting from any host in the example.net domain
'fred' 'x.example.%' fred, connecting from x.example.net, x.example.com, x.example.edu, and so on; this is probably not useful
'fred' '198.51.100.177' fred, connecting from the host with IP address 198.51.100.177
'fred' '198.51.100.%' fred, connecting from any host in the 198.51.100 class C subnet
'fred' '198.51.100.0/255.255.255.0' Same as previous example

It is possible for the client host name and user name of an incoming connection to match more than one row in the user table. The preceding set of examples demonstrates this: Several of the entries shown match a connection from h1.example.net by fred.

When multiple matches are possible, the server must determine which of them to use. It resolves this issue as follows:

  • Whenever the server reads the user table into memory, it sorts the rows.

  • When a client attempts to connect, the server looks through the rows in sorted order.

  • The server uses the first row that matches the client host name and user name.

The server uses sorting rules that order rows with the most-specific Host values first. Literal host names and IP addresses are the most specific. (The specificity of a literal IP address is not affected by whether it has a netmask, so 198.51.100.13 and 198.51.100.0/255.255.255.0 are considered equally specific.) The pattern '%' means any host and is least specific. The empty string '' also means any host but sorts after '%'. Rows with the same Host value are ordered with the most-specific User values first (a blank User value means any user and is least specific). For rows with equally-specific Host and User values, the order is nondeterministic.

To see how this works, suppose that the user table looks like this:

+-----------+----------+-
| Host      | User     | ...
+-----------+----------+-
| %         | root     | ...
| %         | jeffrey  | ...
| localhost | root     | ...
| localhost |          | ...
+-----------+----------+-

When the server reads the table into memory, it sorts the rows using the rules just described. The result after sorting looks like this:

+-----------+----------+-
| Host      | User     | ...
+-----------+----------+-
| localhost | root     | ...
| localhost |          | ...
| %         | jeffrey  | ...
| %         | root     | ...
+-----------+----------+-

When a client attempts to connect, the server looks through the sorted rows and uses the first match found. For a connection from localhost by jeffrey, two of the rows from the table match: the one with Host and User values of 'localhost' and '', and the one with values of '%' and 'jeffrey'. The 'localhost' row appears first in sorted order, so that is the one the server uses.

Here is another example. Suppose that the user table looks like this:

+----------------+----------+-
| Host           | User     | ...
+----------------+----------+-
| %              | jeffrey  | ...
| h1.example.net |          | ...
+----------------+----------+-

The sorted table looks like this:

+----------------+----------+-
| Host           | User     | ...
+----------------+----------+-
| h1.example.net |          | ...
| %              | jeffrey  | ...
+----------------+----------+-

A connection by jeffrey from h1.example.net is matched by the first row, whereas a connection by jeffrey from any host is matched by the second.

Note

It is a common misconception to think that, for a given user name, all rows that explicitly name that user are used first when the server attempts to find a match for the connection. This is not true. The preceding example illustrates this, where a connection from h1.example.net by jeffrey is first matched not by the row containing 'jeffrey' as the User column value, but by the row with no user name. As a result, jeffrey is authenticated as an anonymous user, even though he specified a user name when connecting.

If you are able to connect to the server, but your privileges are not what you expect, you probably are being authenticated as some other account. To find out what account the server used to authenticate you, use the CURRENT_USER() function. (See Section 12.15, “Information Functions”.) It returns a value in user_name@host_name format that indicates the User and Host values from the matching user table row. Suppose that jeffrey connects and issues the following query:

  1. +----------------+
  2. +----------------+
  3. | @localhost     |
  4. +----------------+

The result shown here indicates that the matching user table row had a blank User column value. In other words, the server is treating jeffrey as an anonymous user.

Another way to diagnose authentication problems is to print out the user table and sort it by hand to see where the first match is being made.


Suchen Sie im MySQL-Handbuch

Deutsche Übersetzung

Sie haben gebeten, diese Seite auf Deutsch zu besuchen. Momentan ist nur die Oberfläche übersetzt, aber noch nicht der gesamte Inhalt.

Wenn Sie mir bei Übersetzungen helfen wollen, ist Ihr Beitrag willkommen. Alles, was Sie tun müssen, ist, sich auf der Website zu registrieren und mir eine Nachricht zu schicken, in der Sie gebeten werden, Sie der Gruppe der Übersetzer hinzuzufügen, die Ihnen die Möglichkeit gibt, die gewünschten Seiten zu übersetzen. Ein Link am Ende jeder übersetzten Seite zeigt an, dass Sie der Übersetzer sind und einen Link zu Ihrem Profil haben.

Vielen Dank im Voraus.

Dokument erstellt 26/06/2006, zuletzt geändert 26/10/2018
Quelle des gedruckten Dokuments:https://www.gaudry.be/de/mysql-rf-connection-access.html

Die Infobro ist eine persönliche Seite, deren Inhalt in meiner alleinigen Verantwortung liegt. Der Text ist unter der CreativeCommons-Lizenz (BY-NC-SA) verfügbar. Weitere Informationen auf die Nutzungsbedingungen und dem Autor.

Referenzen

  1. Zeigen Sie - html-Dokument Sprache des Dokuments:en Manuel MySQL : https://dev.mysql.com/

Diese Verweise und Links verweisen auf Dokumente, die während des Schreibens dieser Seite konsultiert wurden, oder die zusätzliche Informationen liefern können, aber die Autoren dieser Quellen können nicht für den Inhalt dieser Seite verantwortlich gemacht werden.
Der Autor Diese Website ist allein dafür verantwortlich, wie die verschiedenen Konzepte und Freiheiten, die mit den Nachschlagewerken gemacht werden, hier dargestellt werden. Denken Sie daran, dass Sie mehrere Quellinformationen austauschen müssen, um das Risiko von Fehlern zu reduzieren.

Inhaltsverzeichnis Haut